…how many layers of redundancy are we willing to launch before calling it a base instead of an extremely expensive campsite. Junior’s “research shack” framing is probably right, but even a shack needs heaters, pumps, excavators and a life-support system that doesn’t appreciate brownouts.
Solar at the peaks plus a buried fission unit makes sense, with batteries or fuel cells handling the boring gaps. I’d also want separate power buses, because one cable fault shouldn’t turn the habitat into a very elaborate freezer. The reactor can be modest; the real trick is making everything fail gracefully, which is apparently harder than putting flags in places.