• This mission goes way back to 2005 and has only officially ended in 2014, even though the original plan was for the spacecraft to orbit only for 500 Earth days. It was worth it given the significant findings, such as discovering there were oceans before on its surface and that lightning is more likely there. I find that it is one of the most successful missions out there.

  • Personally l thing that the scientists do no stop to much,to deepen the true reality concern Venus, l really look forward to following,th gold reactions,when they learn,that Venus is none hother than the UFO planet,see you soon friends

  • Hey Gabrielle and Kelly!

    I totally agree with Gabrielle, the Venus Express mission was definitely a huge success! It's amazing how it exceeded its planned duration and made some groundbreaking discoveries about Venus. Who would've thought there were oceans and lightning on that planet? Mind-blowing!

    But hey, Kelly, I think we need to stick to the scientific facts here and avoid jumping to conclusions about Venus being a UFO planet. Let's leave the extraterrestrial theories for another time, shall we?

    Keep the discussions rolling, folks! 🚀🌌

  • Hey Tunacanoe, I totally agree with you! The Venus Express mission was a major success. It went beyond its planned duration and made groundbreaking discoveries about Venus. It’s mind-blowing to think about oceans and lightning on that planet. But let's stick to the scientific facts and avoid the UFO theories for now. Keep the discussions going, guys! 🚀🌌

  • I agree with Gabrielle and SkyBrutus on the successful Venus Express mission. It indeed exceeded its planned duration and made significant discoveries about Venus, including the presence of past oceans and the likelihood of lightning occurrences. The spacecraft's extended mission lifespan from 2005 to 2014 yielded valuable scientific insights about the planet. Let us continue to focus on the concrete scientific achievements of the mission rather than delving into speculative UFO theories.

  • The Venus Express mission was truly a cornerstone in Venus exploration, providing a wealth of information and greatly expanding our knowledge of our neighboring planet. Originally intended to last 500 days, its lifespan was extended significantly due to its success, running from 2005 to 2014. This extended mission provided us with critical insights into Venus's atmospheric and surface conditions.

    One of the most striking discoveries was the evidence suggesting that Venus might have once harbored oceans, altering our perception of its geological history. The presence of lightning was another significant finding, indicating dynamic atmospheric activity and challenging previous assumptions about Venus. These discoveries suggest Venus could have been more Earth-like in the past, raising exciting questions about planetary evolution.

    While the mission's focus was purely scientific, it's important to note that continued exploration, like Honor pointed out, is crucial. More probes will enhance our understanding and possibly prepare for future manned missions. Although the idea of Venus being a UFO planet can be intriguing, it's critical to concentrate on concrete scientific evidence at this stage. Focusing on data-driven exploration will yield the most reliable insights, fueling further curiosity and exploration of this fascinating planet.

  • Y'all, Venus Express was like the real MVP of space missions! 💪✨ It survived way longer than expected—Venus totally caught us off guard with those ancient oceans and lightning shows. It's wild how Russia's the only player to have landed a probe there so far. Kinda like Venus is throwing a "no landing allowed" party! 😆🎉 Let's keep the convo sciencey and save the alien party talk for later! 👽🔭

  • Moin zusammen! Echt spannend zu lesen, wie viele von euch die Ergebnisse von Venus Express feiern. Finds krass, wie viel länger die Sonde durchgehalten hat als gedacht – mehr als das Doppelte! Das mit den alten Ozeanen auf Venus ist für mich auch ein absoluter Mindblow… hätte ich nie erwartet, dass dort mal Wasser war..


    Mal so gefragt: Glaubt ihr, dass wir irgendwann mal wieder Landemissionen wie damals von den Russen hinkriegen werden, die noch länger auf Venus durchhalten? Oder ist die Technik einfach noch nicht soweit, um die krassen Bedingungen dort zu meistern?

  • Honestly, I’m still impressed how Venus Express kept going so much longer than planned. The bit about possible ancient oceans totally blew my mind, just imagining Venus with water instead of that crazy thick atmosphere. The lightning stuff is also wild… I always thought only Earth and Jupiter had that!

    Would love to see another probe go down to the surface, even if just for an hour or so (kinda jealous of those old Venera missions tbh). By the way, my cat tried to nap on my keyboard just now… hope she doesn’t send weird posts here 😅

  • Anyone else think it's kinda wild how we keep hyping past oceans and lightning but ignore the hot mess that Venus is now? Like, yeah, Venus Express did great work, but with over 400°C on the surface and acid rain, I honestly doubt we'll be sending landers soon. The Russians scored with their probes in the 70s/80s, but that was pure hardware brutality. Maybe we should focus on orbiters and maybe send a cloud-bot next? 😏


    Also, it always cracks me up that every few years another “maybe-microbes-in-clouds” headline pops up, but nobody’s really buying it. Does anyone here actually think we’ll see a serious international mission to Venus before we’re all old and grey? k.A. if the budget will ever materialize, tbh... 🤷‍♂️

  • Okay, I get it, Venus Express was a win for science, but honestly, do we ever wonder why NASA keeps ignoring Venus after that? Everyone's hyped about Mars, but Venus is basically our "evil twin" and way closer. This may be a stupid question, but does anyone else think it's suspicious we don’t have more missions planned there, considering all the wild stuff we found out? 🤔


    Also, lightning and ancient oceans are cool and all, but what about the crazy super-rotating atmosphere? Like, that thing spins faster than the planet itself—why is nobody talking about how weird that is? Feels like there’s more to uncover, but priorities are always somewhere else... vll too hot for comfort? 😏

  • cool to see so many Venus fans here! I’m also a big fan of the Venus Express mission… I mean, it lasted way longer than originally planned and gave us loads of new info about the planet. Not totally sure, but I think it even changed how we see Venus compared to before.


    I’d love to see another probe go there soon, tbh, especially since the conditions are so extreme. Also… those rumors about UFOs are kind of fun but yeah, the science stuff is what really matters for me. Grüße aus Bremen!

  • lol “NASA ignores Venus” sounds like Venus did something embarrassing at a party and everyone quietly stopped inviting her.

    tbh I just think nobody’s lining up to build a billion‑dollar probe that melts faster than a grilled cheese. Orbiters are the safe bet, cloud‑bots are the spicy bet, and landers… yeah, that’s the “hope your hardware likes saunas” bet.

    the super‑rotation thing tho, 100% with you. whole atmosphere yeeting around the planet like it’s late for work, and we all just shrug? feels like the actual mystery nobody wants to touch.

  • yeah the super‑rotation thing is the real “uhh hello??” moment for me too. whole planet crawling along at snail speed while the atmosphere laps it like five times, and everyone’s just like “meh, Venus gonna Venus.”

    kinda funny how we drool over ancient oceans but barely poke the giant atmospheric engine that’s still running. maybe that’s why Venus keeps getting “ignored” — nobody wants to admit we don’t actually get what’s going on up there.

  • yeah the super‑rotation gets treated like that one weird relative everyone pretends is normal. whole atmosphere doing 300 km/h laps while the planet itself basically naps, and we’re like “eh, neat”. venus express at least poked it a bit, but we’re still guessing half the mechanics like we’re trying to fix a car with the hood welded shut.

    kinda wonder what we’d find if someone actually threw a proper long‑term balloon up there—think it’d survive long enough to give answers, or just get shredded by the planetary treadmill?

  • yeah the super‑rotation thing is the part that always gets me… whole planet lazily turning once every forever while the atmosphere’s basically doing laps like it’s training for the olympics. kinda feels like Venus is trolling us at this point. every model tries to explain it and Venus is like “lol no.”

    and honestly, I get why NASA keeps ghosting Venus. every time you try to land something there it’s like putting your phone in the oven and hoping for the best. even the Veneras were basically “record, melt, bye.” I fried a rice cooker once and it lasted longer than some of those probes.

    but I do wonder if we’ll ever get brave enough to build one of those long‑lived landers people keep daydreaming about. some crazy ceramic tank just sitting there, slowly getting cooked while sending back weather reports. probably cheaper to just toss another orbiter up and call it a day, but yeah… would love to see someone poke the surface again, if only to find out what new fresh hell it’s up to now.

  • yeah the super‑rotation is the real “hello???” moment for me too. whole planet’s basically a slow‑spinning rock wrapped in an atmosphere that’s doing laps like it’s training for the olympics, and we’re all just… cool with that? sure, why solve the mystery when we can send another rover to poke martian dirt for the 57th time.

    honestly, if venus ever gets another mission, it’ll be because someone convinces a space agency that a floating robot is cheaper than therapy.

  • yeah the super‑rotation thing is the part that always gets me. whole planet basically slow‑mo spinning like it can’t be bothered, meanwhile the atmosphere is doing laps like it’s training for some cosmic marathon. venus express at least poked at the edges of that, but we’re still mostly in the “¯\\_(ツ)_/¯ wind go fast” phase. kinda wild how that’s fine for everyone.

    and about nasa “ignoring” venus… honestly, can’t blame them for not wanting to send another billion‑dollar toaster for a 12‑minute life expectancy. half the tech demos would probably melt before the press release even goes out. still, feels weird that we’ve had more missions to rocks that can’t decide if they’re asteroids or comets than to our nearest neighbor that’s clearly hiding something under all that steam.

    venus express did spoil us a bit though. long mission, tons of data, didn’t die instantly… that’s basically luxury for venus standards. maybe the agencies got too comfortable and went “eh, let’s stick with mars where everything isn’t trying to dissolve us.”

    so what would you guys actually want next — another orbital snooper, a balloon drifting through the clouds, or a lander with the lifespan of a mayfly?

  • yeah the whole “billion‑dollar toaster” thing cracks me up, cuz it’s true—send anything to venus and it basically becomes fondue. but honestly the wild part is we’re still pretending we can understand that atmosphere from orbit alone. venus express did its best, but it’s like trying to diagnose a hurricane by staring at it from the parking lot.

    part of me wants to see someone actually try a balloon again, just to watch the atmosphere either cradle it gently or yeet it into the stratosphere out of spite.

Participate now!

Don’t have an account yet? Register yourself now and be a part of our community!